4 ms·
To be fair, there's no mention on the README that it's for research or education, so I think it's reasonable to judge it as a "production" tool.
by sevg 2y ago
To be fair, there's no mention on the README that it's for research or education, so I think it's reasonable to judge it as a "production" tool.
- alexvitkov 2y agoIf you by default treat every GitHub repo as quality production code unless explicitly mentioned otherwise, you're in for a bad time.
- sevg 2y agoNo, I didn't say assume it is production quality, I said "judge". In other words, measure it against a higher standard. First person compared it to WireGuard, next person said yeah but it's probably for education, and I'm saying yeah but I think it's fair to compare it to WireGuard since the README doesn't make it clear whether it's a toy or a production tool. And if you compare it to WireGuard then it becomes clear you shouldn't use this thing if you want real encryption.