4 ms·

It sounds like an independent third party needs to review what happened.

• firesteelrain 2y ago
  No, that’s entirely unnecessary and unrealistic. This happens nearly every day between a Buyer and Seller. Entropic was basically on a Time and Materials (T&M) contract. Buyer (DEFCON) had every right to terminate when it looked like costs were starting to soar. Entropic appears to pulling at some emotional response with their initial introduction in regards to LBGTQ, etc. That’s irrelevant information.
  • kalleboo 2y ago
    You've seen the contract?
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
  • krisoft 2y ago
    > Entropic was basically on a Time and Materials (T&M) contract. What is your source for this?
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
  • trickstra 2y ago
    > when it looked like costs were starting to soar. But it appears they waited until the end.
    • firesteelrain 2y ago
      This is unfortunate however it is common. DEFCON still had the right to terminate and try to salvage what they did by sending their own team. EE got in over their head. Contractual terms and timeline should have been better. Starting this in January was probably too late. Badge issues have been common in past years.
      • trickstra 2y ago
        > This is unfortunate however it is common. It is quite common for a big entity to act shitty towards smaller makers. So *if* this is the case, DEFCON are the bad guys, no matter how common it is.
        • deleted 2y ago
          [deleted]
        • firesteelrain 2y ago
          “Big entity to act..” Citation needed. I have never heard this