3 ms·

Not sure why this needs to exist. Wireguard is quicker and easier, and apparently has much better security.

• xmprt 2y ago
  Probably an example of what a minimal VPN could look like. I think it's more for educational purposes rather than to actually be used.
  • sevg 2y ago
    To be fair, there's no mention on the README that it's for research or education, so I think it's reasonable to judge it as a "production" tool.
    • alexvitkov 2y ago
      If you by default treat every GitHub repo as quality production code unless explicitly mentioned otherwise, you're in for a bad time.
      • sevg 2y ago
        No, I didn't say assume it is production quality, I said "judge". In other words, measure it against a higher standard. First person compared it to WireGuard, next person said yeah but it's probably for education, and I'm saying yeah but I think it's fair to compare it to WireGuard since the README doesn't make it clear whether it's a toy or a production tool. And if you compare it to WireGuard then it becomes clear you shouldn't use this thing if you want real encryption.
  • vendiddy 2y ago
    Even if for educational purposes, a tool intended for security should have good security.
• mojyack 2y ago
  Of course, I think WireGuard is more robust and powerful. But I wanted a tool that was simple and quick to set up. And it's a great way to learn about networking.