4 ms·
See also Perkeep, from Brad Fitzpatrick https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkeep https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkeep
by jonahbenton 2y ago
See also Perkeep, from Brad Fitzpatrick
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkeep https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkeep
- vineyardmike 2y agoI've always been really interested in Perkeep, and I think it gets a lot of things right architecturally. I'm always disappointed though whenever I go to use it. It seems like it's just missing one or two things, and there is no community that has grown around it. It's also kinda a pain to extend, because all of the types are hard-coded as structs within the project, so anything new basically needs to be written in vs added on top. For example, the project docs are practically impossible to use. You need to review source if you want to create a configuration file yourself (needed to use any data store besides sqlite index + local files). There are just conflicting explanations, outdated descriptions, etc. Additionally, the project spends a lot of time saying "objects not files" but the only objects defined and used by the system are... files.