3 ms·
And this is in fact what the spec lays out, contrary to the quote from the paper. The PK header is a convention. Conforming parsers don't require it, but lazy i
by FreakLegion 2y ago
And this is in fact what the spec lays out, contrary to the quote from the paper. The PK header is a convention. Conforming parsers don't require it, but lazy implementations often do. This has led to more than one security incident over the years.
- bloatfish 2y agoYeah and PK is the signature per record - it's not a file header. Did these guys read the format specification at all?