3 ms·
I can get behind that. I see some of the same issue in regards to type annotation. I'm heavily leaning into the dynamic / duck-typing aspects of Python, so type
by mrweasel 2y ago
I can get behind that. I see some of the same issue in regards to type annotation. I'm heavily leaning into the dynamic / duck-typing aspects of Python, so type annotation is often complicated or very broad, to the point where it's a little redundant. If you're not really writing code like that, type annotation is an awesome addition to the language.
I'd be very interested in seeing where this goes, it certainly has it's uses, but there's also a ton of projects where it really doesn't belong.
- pauleveritt 2y agoI'd be interested in chatting with you sometime on duck typing (protocols) and how it (along with this PEP) could bring component-driven development to Python.