3 ms·
Absolutely not. I don't know Rust and I think it is worse than C++ in many ways. This is a false dichotomy, they don't have to switch language mid-course.
by stephc_int13 2y ago
Absolutely not.
I don't know Rust and I think it is worse than C++ in many ways.
This is a false dichotomy, they don't have to switch language mid-course.
- JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B 2y agoI am very confused by your message. I know both Rust and C++ and think it’s an improvement in many ways. Why do you you think it’s worse without using the language?
- stephc_int13 2y agoI don't use it, it does not mean that I know nothing about it. I know enough. Rust is extremely anti-ergonomic for me, and too complex, just as bad or worse than C++ in that regard.
- zozbot234 2y agoThe original tweet was essentially complaining about boilerplate, which is all that's involved in managing most "complex object graphs" in Rust. If you think some minor boilerplate makes languages "extremely anti-ergonomic" I sure hope you're not writing Java.