4 ms·
Hey there! Intuitively I would be surprised if the tesseract-way was better to be honest. I'm not the most experienced with OCR but I have tried Tesseract in
by jdthedisciple 2y ago
Hey there!
Intuitively I would be surprised if the tesseract-way was better to be honest.
I'm not the most experienced with OCR but I have tried Tesseract in the past and had difficulties. Like others mentioned, it would mix up things like 4 vs A etc. and had massive issues with decimal numbers.
I have had zero such issues with zerox.
Someone on HN also recently mentioned that tesseract is OCR of the past and basically outlived by a long shot already, I feel like that might be true.
Btw I feel extremely lucky to have found Zerox because we needed a solution like that at work and so I introduced it and spun up a prototype to solve our problem and it works so well (combined with the brand new "strict json" feature by openai), so really great job making it!