2 ms·
No it is not. By not distinguishing consumption methods the authors likely gained a huge increase in sample size which helps them have more confidence in their
by ImaCake 2y ago
No it is not. By not distinguishing consumption methods the authors likely gained a huge increase in sample size which helps them have more confidence in their statistics. There are trade offs here which are not obvious without understanding how quantity can be a quality all of its own.
- quesera 2y agoWe have plenty of evidence that the inhalation of combustion products will have negative health effects. If that's all the study says, then it does not add to existing knowledge, and really isn't about cannabis at all. That's a kind of uselessness. So why was the study conducted (this way), and why does CNN consider it newsworthy? The answers to those questions might be more interesting than the study itself.