3 ms·
It's this one: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/fiche.jsf?id=T%3B1080%3B23%3BRD%3B1%3BP%3B1%3BT2023%2F1080%2FP&nat=or&mat=or&pcs=Oor&jur=T&num=T-1080%252F23&for=&j
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
It's this one: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/fiche.jsf?id=T%3B1080%3B23%3BRD%3B1%3BP%3B1%3BT2023%2F1080%2FP&nat=or&mat=or&pcs=Oor&jur=T&num=T-1080%252F23&for=&jge=&dates=&language=en&pro=&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&oqp=&td=%3BALL&avg=&lgrec=en&lg=&cid=3423184 https://curia.europa.eu/juris/fiche.jsf?id=T%3B1080%3B23%3BR...
And here is a comment I made a while ago explaining the whole thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40774261 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40774261
- Kon-Peki 2y agoI see that FSFE has a new blog post up today [1]. There are a few links in the post; I've read them as best I can. Is this case about iMessage only, or about all of their gate-kept services? It seems like Apple is only contesting iMessage (at least in the linked case). [1] https://fsfe.org/news/2024/news-20240812-01.en.html https://fsfe.org/news/2024/news-20240812-01.en.html