3 ms·
And if it is is by Nous Research we there definitely needs to be clearer branding as this is very confusing. If OP is not Nous Research (which I suspect to be
by crystal_revenge 2y ago
And if it is is by Nous Research we there definitely needs to be clearer branding as this is very confusing.
If OP is not Nous Research (which I suspect to be the case) then a name change is a must as they're already a fairly well established company in the LLM space (surprised OP isn't aware of the name collision already). It's a bit similar to creating a new library with the "Smiling Face with Open Hands emoji"[0] as your logo
0. https://emojipedia.org/hugging-face https://emojipedia.org/hugging-face
- downrightmike 2y agoNever heard of you
- crystal_revenge 2y agoI'm not affiliated with Nous Research in anyway, but do work in the LLM space and at least in this community it's a fairly well known org. Since this project also is in that space I was just adding support for parent's observation.
- zwaps 2y agoYeah but in the LLM/AI space, everyone who isn’t total newbie knows Nous Research And this framework kinda does fall within that space
- campers 2y agoWhen I first picked the name, after a chat with Claude, I hadn't come across Nous Research back then, and they didn't show up Googling for just nous. I see a bit of reuse of words in other various llm related projects. Langchain/langfuse/langflow Llama/ollama/llamaindex so I hadn't been too worried about it when became aware of them. That's what Show HN is for, getting feedback, and a name changed now would be easy before I post it around more.