4 ms·
I think it is yet another "bears walking on redsqare" level of claim (I mean about ternary systems). There was only one minor ternary computer produced by USSR
by IWeldMelons 2y ago
I think it is yet another "bears walking on redsqare" level of claim (I mean about ternary systems). There was only one minor ternary computer produced by USSR ("Setun"); it has never been a big thing.
- jasomill 2y agoSETUN itself was an electronically binary machine that used bit pairs to encode ternary digits[1]. In support of your point, of the Soviet computers surveyed in the cited article, six were pure binary, two used binary-coded decimal numerics, and only SETUN was ternary[2]. [1] [Willis p. 149]https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/367149.1047530#page=19 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/367149.1047530#page=19 [2] [Willis p. 144]https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/367149.1047530#page=14 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/367149.1047530#page=14 [Willis] Willis H. Ware. 1960. Soviet Computer Technology–1959. Commun. ACM 3, 3 (March 1960), 131–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/367149.1047530 https://doi.org/10.1145/367149.1047530