Would love to hear more from this viewpoint. On the surface I don’t see how your argument is against the OP, isn’t it very conceivable that the “continuation of

Would love to hear more from this viewpoint. On the surface I don’t see how your argument is against the OP, isn’t it very conceivable that the “continuation of previous trend but under a different regime” was actually part of the occupation plan? Not arguing against you but the logic needs to be filled out some.