4 ms·
In a way they would be better off using Fortran instead of Python. Every scientific result that relies on a snapshot of 50 packages (whose resolution in conda
by xbdaG 2y ago
In a way they would be better off using Fortran instead of Python.
Every scientific result that relies on a snapshot of 50 packages (whose resolution in conda is an NP-hard problem) should be qualified with an added hypothesis:
Given Python-3.x.y and [50 version numbers of packages], we arrive at the following result.
Even in Python itself the random number generator was broken for more than a year by one of the persons who actively mob people for rejecting their patches (in which they might have a monetary interest since they got paid for many of their patches, making it a gigantic conflict of interest).
This invalidated many scientific results from that period.
- rbanffy 2y ago> This invalidated many scientific results from that period. Did it invalidate any conclusions or it was just corrected results?