"Making a significant number of posts (47 out of 177) to a discussion of a change to bylaws, "which created an atmosphere of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, which

"Making a significant number of posts (47 out of 177) to a discussion of a change to bylaws, "which created an atmosphere of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, which encouraged increasingly emotional responses from other community members."" So other people got emotional and violated the coc? Sounds like their fault. "Defending 'reverse racism' and 'reverse sexism', concepts not backed by empirical evidence, which could be seen as deliberate intimidation or creating an exclusionary environment." So, someone was probably being racist and sexist towards white people and men, and he called them out on it, and this was a code of conduct violation? Anyone involved in this organization is at massive reputational risk. "Dismissing unacceptable behavior of others as a 'neurodivergent' trait, which is problematic because it creates a stereotype that neurodivergent people are hard to interact with and need special treatment." Was this about stallman? It's hard to believe any of the other accusations when these are in there. Maybe some are true, impossible to say when these are included, it just looks like someone with impaired judgement who may be widly misinterpreting reality.