2 ms·
The title of the article is somewhat click-baity, though the "No, not like that" gives a hint. It's not arguing for visual programming like your response is abo
by morning-coffee 2y ago
The title of the article is somewhat click-baity, though the "No, not like that" gives a hint. It's not arguing for visual programming like your response is about, more like "We need more visualization in programming".
- usrbinbash 2y agoWhat for? What exactly is gained by having "more visualization"? Gentle reminder that this isn't a new idea either. Remember UML diagrams? Id do, mostly for how useless they were when it came to actually doing good architecture.