2 ms·
> "[AI] apps are basically changing in production because AI chooses to do what it wants, so you can't expect to have a platform that's just secure and that's i
by Joker_vD 2y ago
> "[AI] apps are basically changing in production because AI chooses to do what it wants, so you can't expect to have a platform that's just secure and that's it," Bargury said. "That's not going to happen because these platforms have to be flexible, otherwise they're not useful."
The first half hits the nail on the head and should be so insanely obvious I am at loss of words that apparently it either isn't, or people just don't care. The second half though... platforms don't have to be extremely flexible to still be useful. After all, whatever we have right now is still pretty useful, right?
Seriously though. You put a black-box software that no one knows how it functions — literally nobody knows that, that's AI for you — with access to everything, you give the whole Internet access to it (and give it access to the whole Internet), and then you... hope it won't get hacked, or what? As they tell you at Compliance 101, "hope is not a valid mitigation strategy".
- dijksterhuis 2y agoI really liked this bit > The bottom line is that businesses are the guinea pigs testing an experimental drug called "artificial intelligence," and we're not at a point where we know how to make it safe yet. Like, machine learning models are not secure enough. Nowhere near enough. I wonder if they ever can be because they’re probabilistic. Yet everyone is throwing everything into LLMs and hoping for the best. There’s some good practice recommendations out there, but the fact that Microsoft didn’t even set up safe defaults for their enterprise services is just… not good.