> Again though, sponsored clubs for a particular gender are a luxury good. I think my point here is that a company-sponsored women in tech club is actually not

> Again though, sponsored clubs for a particular gender are a luxury good. I think my point here is that a company-sponsored women in tech club is actually not that expensive and deliberately created to co-opt what would otherwise be a collective interest. It is certainly less expensive than giving concessions to women. That is the calculation. Imagine if women with children had organized and collectively refused RTO. Now you’re looking at either caving or finding replacements, depending on the feasibility of firing them. > it is Men vs. Women in this completely fabricated war on tech I agree, it isn’t men vs. women. It is various interest groups vs. management. One of those interest groups happens to be parents who take care of kids. Corporate friendly “glass ceiling” framing only came later to redirect attention away from management. None of this is to say RTO wasn’t a burden for men either.