This is all bullshit. Speculation. And to think it came from the NY Times. "P2P packets" are signs of depression in a college campus because people are sharing

This is all bullshit. Speculation. And to think it came from the NY Times. "P2P packets" are signs of depression in a college campus because people are sharing files? Am I reading this right?! They're sharing movies and music - that's where it all started. Certain users with high email usage?? How can you identify spam vs. actual? How can you state that some people simply aren't busy and receive a ton of email (including professors)?? And then this leads to speculation of "anxiety" symptoms. Haha. Great correlation there. Who writes this crap. Not only is the data they collected so broad and irrelevant, it cannot be accurately used against empirical (medical, depression-related) data to come up with some crap story that users that P2P are depressed. The notion of them logging and analyzing detailed user data in the future is the cherry on top to a fascinatingly stupid read! Goodnight, back to my IDE