2 ms·
You used the median, I used the mean. I think the latter is more useful here, but regardless, even using the median, that ratio is still god awful and not livea
by JohnMakin 2y ago
You used the median, I used the mean. I think the latter is more useful here, but regardless, even using the median, that ratio is still god awful and not liveable.
- ajross 2y agoYou didn't cite numbers. But if anything the "mean" in a long tail signal like urban incomes is going to be much *higher* than the median, which cuts in my direction, not yours. But if you want to post numbers I'm happy to have the discussion I mentioned.
- JohnMakin 2y agoyou are right, I was looking at something outdated. However, I think the ratio is still bad enough that it doesn’t matter to my original point.
- stevemk14ebr 2y agothis chain of discussion is hilarious because each step just gets worse