3 ms·
Disclaimer: I used to work at Intel: Specifically, I was the second person on the planet to game on a Celeron Proc. How? Me and my best friend ran the Intel De
by samstave 2y ago
Disclaimer: I used to work at Intel:
Specifically, I was the second person on the planet to game on a Celeron Proc. How? Me and my best friend ran the Intel Developer Relations Group Gaming Test Lab in the later half of the 90s.
Our job was to specifically test all PC games that were being developed against the Intel Celeron procs and the amd alts... with a focus on Subjective Gaming Performance of the Celeron as an "Optimized" feature leader whereby developers were given handsome marketing monies to optimize the games against latest SIMD instructions to allow for the games to be more performant on the Celeron.
THe goal: Show the world that a $1,000 fully capable gaming PC was possible, in their budget, and desirable.
---
The Issue at the time was the graphic bottlenecks -- all the pieces had yet to come to fore: AGP, Unreal, OpenGL, ~~NERDS~~ NURBS!, Games, Graphix Chips (VooDoo, 3DFX, blah blah)
Celeron should have died long ago - but certainly when the first, actual GPUs came along and did the heavy lifting.
I have a lot of thoughts about Intels mess (Transmetta really fucked Intel up in the way an abusive step-relative would) and caused them to lose focus...
Then, just the ridiculous amount of marketing over engineering....
(if anyone worked at intel in the DRG circles in SC5 - and has access to emails of that day - search my name and the thread I started asking why we cant just physically stack CPUs on top of eachother... (this was prior to the Voxel timeline) and was laughed at. it wasnt until several years after that I went on a hike with a labs head and found out about the 64-core text CPUs that were only coming out)
---
I was just having shower-thoughts about intels future as effectively computing grout -- a mechanism to get data from real-world INTO NVIDIA GPUs and then displayed again real-world. And thats it. Thats the only thing Intel may be doing in the future - is grout to display the data components solely computed, as NVIDIA CEO stated himself "All compute will be done on NVIDIA chips" -- delivery of the data through intel's grout (minimally) then again delivered to an NVIDIA desktop GPU...
Intel is like the maintenance staff of a home. NVIDIA is the architect, interior designer, party planner and end user.
(Intel was my first ever stock package: $70 with a $125 option price. 10K shares. I left before ever vesting... it was the late 90s and I had to chase the dream intc: https://i.imgur.com/U9PWURv.png https://i.imgur.com/U9PWURv.png )
- gdiamos 2y agoEven then, why is Intel better grout than AMD today?
- samstave 2y agoGood point to ask -- I meant any "CPU Only" technology company. Personally what Intel should have shifted to was owning and building all the Fabs. Sure they have them and are building them etc... but they missed the timing a bit. I dont follow them close enough any longer - but they really should have gone all in on being the US TSMC... rather than the bit of catchup they are in... They arent going anywhere (the birth of Intel from Fairchild was in Missle circuits - and the US War Leviathan will always have intel circuits in the big-ticket items. Forever.