4 ms·
It’s a selection effect. If you trained all of the people qualified to become astronauts into becoming astronauts you would incur the opportunity costs of those
by philwelch 2y ago
It’s a selection effect. If you trained all of the people qualified to become astronauts into becoming astronauts you would incur the opportunity costs of those people not applying their talents and ambitions elsewhere.
- pfdietz 2y agoSo, you're saying we're actually losing value by training an astronaut, since their talents are not available or elsewhere? Or that astronauts should be chosen from the otherwise useless? Trying to understand here. I'm sure we can find plenty of low value people to transmute into incredibly valuable secular saints of space. No need to waste the otherwise useful.
- philwelch 2y ago> So, you're saying we're actually losing value by training an astronaut, since their talents are not available or elsewhere? This is called “opportunity cost” and it’s a basic concept. > Or that astronauts should be chosen from the otherwise useless? That wouldn’t work because those people couldn’t become useful astronauts. > I'm sure we can find plenty of low value people to transmute into incredibly valuable secular saints of space. No need to waste the otherwise useful. The smug, superior attitude here doesn’t really work when you’re mocking basic concepts like opportunity cost or being qualified for a job. It just makes you come across as an anti-intellectual clown. If you tried engaging in good faith you might learn something.