3 ms·

Just to be clear, you're saying that the judge [1], the Justice Department [2], and journalists[3] are all wrong? If you want to be pedantic about it, they have

• fuzztester 2y ago
  I am making a rare exception to my statement about not engaging with you further (because of the crap that you wrote earlier), because of the other crap that you wrote above (only in order to point that crap out to other readers): half the links (i.e. 1 and 2) you quoted above don't work for me. paywalls or signup required? clever you, eh? not! and link 4 is too long and verbose. I searched for the word effective, but did not find it in the initial part on the screen. aaannnddd ... you are quoting journalists (!) as though they are automatically competent authorities? and even judges' decisions sometimes get reversed by higher courts. so effectively you have no point. hee ... hee ... hee ... looks like, in your arguments, you thrive on appeals to faux authority, and nothing else, particularly not on reasoning. so, tata, bye bye, dude. this sort of argument is below me. bless you. you need it.