Totally valid take. The answer is: it depends. The advantage of a lot of scripting tech is some form of REPL, which is really just a super-fast code-compile-ru

Totally valid take. The answer is: it depends. The advantage of a lot of scripting tech is some form of REPL, which is really just a super-fast code-compile-run loop. In your example, "why?" boils down to how useful/painful those five seconds-per-change are. Maybe that adds up and slows the coder down, or maybe it's no big deal. It all kind of depends on the workflow and how fast you need to be able to iterate on code changes. Moving to a scripted interpreter would eliminate that wait period at the cost of runtime performance, which might be a valuable business tradeoff. FWIW, that "script" solution sounds awesome for the time. I'll add that five seconds to build a hot-loaded DLL in the 90's is really, really good performance for that solution, regardless of its role as a scripting alternative. Today, that would probably be mere milliseconds to compile - impossible to distinguish from an embedded LUA or JS solution.