3 ms·
sure, but I suppose that 10000 people boiling their own drinking water would maybe be more energy intensive / less efficient. But I can see I got multiple down
by bryanrasmussen 2y ago
sure, but I suppose that 10000 people boiling their own drinking water would maybe be more energy intensive / less efficient.
But I can see I got multiple down votes for this supposition already.
- ahahahahah 2y agoThe majority of water is used in ways that none of it would be drank. Even just looking at homes, only about 20% of water in a typical home is used in the faucet (and I expect that's primarily not for drinking). You'd almost need to set up an entirely separate distribution system for it to be more efficient than doing it in the home.
- bryanrasmussen 2y agoOK, pretty good example of my not considering all the inputs to the problem even though I knew all the inputs.