4 ms·
The issue of doing in-house is the issue of finding competent devs, meaning not only "someone who code" but someone who understand how to PROPER design things,
by kkfx 2y ago
The issue of doing in-house is the issue of finding competent devs, meaning not only "someone who code" but someone who understand how to PROPER design things, witch is essentially a lost art.
EDIFACT is dramatically simple, far more than modern XML-based peppol alike dialects, here the issue is "just" knowing that very likely any "institution" might have injected a gazillion of personal stuff, mostly undocumented or badly documented to be take into account for a long interim, but developing a personal ERP trying the modern path is far from being digestible.
IMVHO it's feasible trying to fish common-lisp/clojure world. That's a niche enough there is not much retention issue, and there are still skilled devs because it's a kind of niche where some arrive, try, fail and go, some skillful remain and do want to be there.