3 ms·

Schematics - you mean people _want_ water if they _want_ to live and _want_ to do it in a healthy manor?

• meowster 2y ago
  There's quite a difference with your example than the exchange you were replying to. (For what it's worth, I have no problem with people wanting to accessorize their bodies with lipstick. I don't see beauty in those things, but I have no problem with others seeing beauty that way. Ultimately it is a choice though, as people can also decide to be beautiful through their grace, words, actions, etc; not what some company tells them they need.)
  • chucksta 2y ago
    Huge difference, one might say life and death. Neither do I but want vs need is almost entirely subjective. >Ultimately it is a choice though That's my point, context independent
    • buran77 2y ago
      > people _want_ water if they _want_ to live > want vs need is almost entirely subjective People need water if they want to live. Somehow you managed to picked the one need which is literally the single biggest need for life as we know it to exist, making it quite the opposite of "entirely subjective". A statement like "I think pretty paint on lips is just as important as water because everything is subjective" is not making the point you think it is.
      • chucksta 2y ago
        Its almost like I picked an extreme example intentionally and then made a joke about it to illustrate it was intentional. I wrote my point you missed it. Which did I say? "almost entirely subjective" or "entirely subjective"? Where did I write the quote "I think pretty paint on lips is just as important as water because everything is subjective"? I remember writing "context independent" tho as to indicate it's not about lipstick its about semantics of defining a need