As the author of the post they were replying to, I can say definitively that this is a refutation of what I was posting, and you are arguing with the wind. I m

As the author of the post they were replying to, I can say definitively that this is a refutation of what I was posting, and you are arguing with the wind. I made a claim about specific wording which was correctly pointed out to be incorrect. There was no claim made about the "spirit" on either side or interpretation. I made a factually incorrect claim that was pointed out to be factually incorrect; I don't know why you are continuing to argue.