3 ms·
Huh? I don't see how MS has any blame in any of this. Client chooses not to upgrade systems. Client chooses to use crowdstrike as a vendor. Client chooses not t
by rndmize 2y ago
Huh? I don't see how MS has any blame in any of this. Client chooses not to upgrade systems. Client chooses to use crowdstrike as a vendor. Client chooses not to accept free support. At what point was MS supposed to do something here? There are loads of things to complain about or take issue with when it comes to MS, but I don't see how this is one of them.
- Rastonbury 2y agoComment seems to imply it's MS fault for maintaining backward compatibility
- nitinreddy88 2y agoEssentially, he is stating being good at backward compatibility is the problem :-/