5 ms·
>anyone who is content to sign away their personal autonomy to a violent organization Honestly non-physical violence is sometimes overlooked. Economic decisio
by Iulioh 2y ago
>anyone who is content to sign away their personal autonomy to a violent organization
Honestly non-physical violence is sometimes overlooked.
Economic decisions cause way more violence is mpre subtle ways.
A new policy in banking or from insurance companies can lead to more deaths than a what an entire branch of the military.
Hell, i think high decisions from Google can cause deaths in prioritizing certain arguments over others.
So i don't think that just begin a part of the system makes you bad, making the decisions does.
- dTal 2y agoRight, we all have a responsibility to act ethically in all parts of our lives. Refuse to work for organizations that do unethical things; if you are in an organization, refuse to do unethical things even if it gets you fired. Do not facilitate the doing of unethical things in any way. The difference with the military is you can be put in prison for behaving this way.
- Iulioh 2y agoFrom the other side of the argument >>Refuse to work for organizations that do unethical things Is a easy way to ensure that said organizzation won't ever change.
- dTal 2y agoNot at all. If enough people refuse to compromise their principles, the labor supply will shrink for that org, and therefore their hiring costs will increase, leaving them fewer resources to achieve their unethical deeds. "I'll change it from the inside" is a lie people tell themselves, but in reality they get steamrollered by the internal processes. If you don't have a backbone at hiring time, why would you grow one down the line when you're already dependent on them for your livelihood? No - do your part and refuse to play.