I’m the author of the original issue — I agree, we’ll have to ensure the struct layout is solved. I think the only thing that makes sense is to just waste a lit

I’m the author of the original issue — I agree, we’ll have to ensure the struct layout is solved. I think the only thing that makes sense is to just waste a little space and store the fields side-by-side. In almost all cases where people would use a struct I think this is an acceptable tradeoff. At the point where you have more than 5 cases, the GC overhead starts to get shrink in comparison to the calling convention and copying overhead anyway.