3 ms·
> He’s referring to the patterns on the glass not the shape of the glass. That's clearly not true... It's not the patterns on the glass that separate a champag
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> He’s referring to the patterns on the glass not the shape of the glass.
That's clearly not true... It's not the patterns on the glass that separate a champagne glass from a cognac one. Or different sizes of beer glasses...! Did we read the same sentence?
- Retric 2y agoAgain this isn’t about champagne glass vs cognac. > That's clearly not true... It's not the patterns on the glass I was calling attention to where aeyes said “I had these glasses with kids prints.” clearly a reference to decoration not the types of glasses produced. The company varied both the types of gasses and the decoration on those glasses, but the article is only giving them credit to the types of glass not the wide range of purely cosmetic designs.
- hn_throwaway_99 2y agoFWIW, as the original commenter you replied to, just wanted to say not sure why you're getting these negative responses - I appreciated your clarification and didn't originally see that last image with the glasses with decorations. What you wrote made sense to me.