4 ms·
Didn't write anything about justification. Just wrote that typically anyone with power abuses it. And that includes both sides. I've seen too many movements c
by ethbr1 2y ago
Didn't write anything about justification.
Just wrote that typically anyone with power abuses it. And that includes both sides.
I've seen too many movements convinced of their own righteousness and neglect keeping their house in order.
Or have you never seen a group who tolerates problematic individuals (and keeps silence about them) because they're "one of the group"?
- mulmen 2y agoThis still sounds like faulty logic. The existence of bias in one case doesn't prove it in all cases. Sometimes there really is just an innocent victim. Further, there's no reason to believe there are two sides to any issue. Reality is messy. Your test is too simplistic and fails basic validation.
- ethbr1 2y ago> The existence of bias in one case doesn't prove it in all cases. It proves a source has an editorial department that is either fine with the piece as written or didn't do due diligence. Rarely is there really just an innocent victim. Reality is messy.