4 ms·
I’ve noticed this in article summaries. It does seem to have some weird biases. I’ve been able to get around that by directly asking it for pros/cons or “what
by cj 2y ago
I’ve noticed this in article summaries. It does seem to have some weird biases.
I’ve been able to get around that by directly asking it for pros/cons or “what are the downsides” or “identify any inconsistencies” or “where are the main risks”… etc
There’s also a complexity threshold where it performs much better if you break a simple question down into multiple parts. You can basically to prompt-based transformations of your own input to break down information and analyze it in different ways prior to using all of that information to finally answer a higher level question.
I wish ChatGPT could do this behind the scenes. Prompt itself “what questions should I ask myself that would help me answer this question?” And go through all those steps without exposing it to the user. Or maybe it can or already does, but it still seems like I get significantly better results when I do it manually and walk ChatGPT through the thought process myself.
- Propelloni 2y agoIf you can do that and do it, for what do you need to ask the chatbot? Genuine question, because in my mind that's the heavy lifting you do there and you will get to a conclusion in the process. All the bot can do is agree with you and that serves what purpose?
- markovs_gun 2y agoAnother interesting case with this is an instance I had with Google Assistant's AI summary feature for group chats. In the group chat, my mom said that my grandma was in the hospital and my sister said she was going to go visit her. In the AI summary, my grandma was on vacation and my sister was in the hospital. Completely useless.