4 ms·
This is a very US-centric view. Further, it could be applied all the way down the rabbit-hole. "My brother has MS, and my sister is a few years from a diagnosis
by seattle_spring 2y ago
This is a very US-centric view. Further, it could be applied all the way down the rabbit-hole. "My brother has MS, and my sister is a few years from a diagnosis. It's nice to know money is being spent on dementia treatments, a disease that almost exclusively affects the elderly already near end-of-life, when that money could be going toward researching cures for diseases affecting people with much more of their lives to live."
Effective altruism sounds nice and fuzzy, but it's pretty silly in practice. It's also not like we can just point all scientists and scientific organizations toward a few of the most highly problematic diseases. At best, there'd be an enormous amount of resources wasted on duplication of efforts.
- HKH2 2y ago> "My brother has MS, and my sister is a few years from a diagnosis. It's nice to know money is being spent on dementia treatments, a disease that almost exclusively affects the elderly already near end-of-life, when that money could be going toward researching cures for diseases affecting people with much more of their lives to live." Sounds reasonable. > At best, there'd be an enormous amount of resources wasted on duplication of efforts. Isn't science about reproducibility?
- _zagj 2y ago>My brother has MS It's telling that the best example you could come up with is yet another neurodegenerative disease, albeit one with some not-so-effective treatments.
- Varriount 2y agoWhat the significance of using a neurodegenerative disease as an example?