4 ms·
It seems that the only relevant license in context is the Functional Source License (FSL). What's the point of this new term only encompassing the accompanying
by 3np 2y ago
It seems that the only relevant license in context is the Functional Source License (FSL).
What's the point of this new term only encompassing the accompanying new license from the same authors, other than to manipulate our minds to associate "FSL" with "fair"?
FSL is a source-available license. "Fair Source" is the name of an industry lobby group. Uncritically adopting their retaxonomization of software licenses and newspeak is not advisable.
The FSL seems like a valuable contribution and can make sense for companies like GitButler and Sentry. The accompanying lobbying and propaganda (aka "PR") spoils that somewhat.
- ezekg 2y agoNot just FSL. There's also the Fair Core License [0], the Business Source License [1], and we're open to adding more given they abide by the Fair Source Definition. We're just getting started. [0]: https://fcl.dev https://fcl.dev [1]: https://mariadb.com/bsl-faq-mariadb/ https://mariadb.com/bsl-faq-mariadb/