3 ms·
This is clearly under dispute and not a fact that can be stated so cleanly . The article itself makes it clear that the Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that this is
by seizethecheese 2y ago
This is clearly under dispute and not a fact that can be stated so cleanly . The article itself makes it clear that the Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that this is not the case.h
- mbStavola 2y agoSeemed to be the case for 50+ years.
- spencerflem 2y ago[flagged]
- RangerScience 2y agoCheck out the book “Legal Systems Very Different From Our Own” for the millennia-old tradition that is “finding a way to interpret a holy text according to your politics”
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- burkaman 2y agoIt is understandably confusing, because the Supreme Court also ruled that it is the case in 2007: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._EPA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._EPA. > greenhouse gases fit well within the CAA's capacious definition of air pollutant - United States Supreme Court
- throw10920 2y agoWikipedia is not a citation.
- consteval 2y agoThis current supreme court is addicted to rolling back anything and everything that is opposed to a conservative position. The clean air act was already ruled to include greenhouse gasses. It's not under dispute, this court just disputes it because they have the power and ultimately are playing an end game of fostering a conservative government, i.e. they have long term political interests.