3 ms·
I'd very much like a license like the LGPL that didn't require releasing object files. Just "if you modify any of the source files and/or scripts, you must prov
by SAI_Peregrinus 2y ago
I'd very much like a license like the LGPL that didn't require releasing object files. Just "if you modify any of the source files and/or scripts, you must provide those modifications under this license". I want something that isn't just donating code to for-profit corporations, that is easy to comply with (only release modifications to the code, no risk of covering code that depends on it, no need to release non-code files), and preserves this for other end-users of the software. A sort of LGPL-like license.
I also want an AGPL-ish version of that. If I release a library, I don't need the source to your application that uses it, but I want to get access to modifications you may have made even if you're only using it in a cloud-computing service. I want an ALGPL!
- singpolyma3 2y agoSounds like you want the MPL family