3 ms·
Instead of working to make the world a better place, now that they have drained the world, they want to protect themselves from the world. Would it really have
by OutOfHere 2y ago
Instead of working to make the world a better place, now that they have drained the world, they want to protect themselves from the world. Would it really have been so bad to make the whole world better?
- surgical_fire 2y agoThe lower classes would benefit. The elites find this very icky. To be a billionaire you first have to be a sociopath.
- Log_out_ 2y agoYes, cause efficient markets wirh loads of consumers eat the one thing you want to safe your empire..time to collapse shrinkes significantly if you accelerate the rate of resource consumption.
- OutOfHere 2y agoNot making any sense.
- Log_out_ 2y agoIts capitalisms goods production that destroys the environment.redistributing fiscal resources top to bottomre results in accelerated spending on those,results in accelerated demise. Concentrating wealth in economically dead zones slows this down. A gilded age buys time for better crashpositions.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]