4 ms·
If I can get it compatible with IE9, is that a big thing for people here? I don't think it would be too hard, thoughts?
by dandonkulous 14y ago
If I can get it compatible with IE9, is that a big thing for people here? I don't think it would be too hard, thoughts?
- legutierr 14y agoI, for one, would never use this while it remains incompatible with a large segment of the web-browsing public. So, yes, I think it would be a big deal. IE8 would be even better. But with IE9 compatibility, at least it would be feasible to start using this when IE8 fades away.
- MatthewPhillips 14y agoI'm not sure IE9 is such a huge win. This already supports IE10, and every Windows 7 computer will be auto-updated to IE10 (if Microsoft holds to it's decision to automatically update from now on). XP users will never get IE9 or IE10, and IE8 can't be supported unfortunately. So I guess Chrome Frame will be necessary to target IE8 users.
- dandonkulous 14y agoIE9 support lands today, and we've decided against supporting earlier versions of IE - too much headache and code bloat/hackishness to justify addressing the ever shrinking < IE9 user base.
- jblz 14y agoIdeally, IE8 should be your minimum. There's a large contingent of web users still on Windows XP and IE9+ is not available for it. XP is in extended support until 2014-08-14 & yes, I'm counting down the days.