4 ms·
Saying that something is better than something else would surely merit a single clinical trial, showing large effect low p outcomes in favor of chemo vs lifestl
by trapper 18y ago
Saying that something is better than something else would surely merit a single clinical trial, showing large effect low p outcomes in favor of chemo vs lifestlye? Can you point to a single study since it is already proven? :)
Here are a few that may change your mind:
http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/1/233S http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/1/233S
http://www.annieappleseedproject.org/lifchancline.html http://www.annieappleseedproject.org/lifchancline.html
http://bastyrcenter.org/content/view/913/ http://bastyrcenter.org/content/view/913/
Surely you must admit that your claim that lifestyle change cannot reduce mortality rate is premature. It's only recently being studied, and with the great early results we will see many more such papers investigating the effects.
My money would be on a combination: Lifestyle change + aggressive supplementation + chemo.
- rms 18y agoI've said that all along -- supplementation + diet change + chemo is better, and certainly no worse, than chemo alone.
- trapper 18y agoAgreed, but read your post again: ...But prevention is not a treatment. You can't raw food your way to a cure to cancer. It just doesn't work. People die because they become so deluded.... "It just doesn't work" is a statement of fact. I showed you some research that refutes this (lifestyle change alone can cure in certain cases). What more do you need to change your opinion?