3 ms·
No, I don't think so, 295x is a crazy high factor. The article says 260 people are involved, and let's generously say it took 20 years to write the software (th
by burkaman 2y ago
No, I don't think so, 295x is a crazy high factor. The article says 260 people are involved, and let's generously say it took 20 years to write the software (the first mission was 10 years after the program started and it was around for a total of 40 years).
Dividing by 295 means a commercial team of the same size could have done it in less than a month. Or with a 10x smaller team, about 8 months. I don't think either of those are plausible.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- swiftcoder 2y agoWe're well in mythical-man-month territory as you try and accelerate the timeline, though. Typical software companies can't coordinate a 260 person team quickly enough to even start a project of that size in a month.