4 ms·

Can I use Magic Loops to generate Magic Loops for me?

jumploops 2y ago
Technically yes, but it would require reverse-engineering some of our APIs. Practically speaking, we have quite a few use-cases where users call Loops from other Loops, so we're investigating a first-class API to generate Loops in one go. Similar to regular software engineering, what you put in is what you get out, so we've been hesitant to launch this with the current state of LLMs/the Loop Creator as it will fail more often than not.
- samstave 2y ago
  This would be great in the extension format: highlights-text --> Right-Click --> New ML --> (smart dropdown for watch [price|name|date|{typed-in-prompt-instructions}] --> TAB --> (smart frequency - tabbing through {watch blah (and its auto-filling every N ) --> NAME_ML=ML01. THEN: highlights-text --> Right-Click .... WHEN {ML01} == N DO {this|ML0X} --> ML00 ML00 == EMAIL|CSV|GDrive results. ML11 == Graph all the above outputs. :-) -- A MasterLoop would be good - where you have all [public or private] loops register - and then you can route logic based on loops that exist - and since its promptable - it can summarize and suggest logic when weaving loops into cohesive lattices of behavior. And if loops can subscribe to the output of other loops -- when youre looking for certain output strands -- you can say: Find all the MLB loops daily and summarize what they say about only the Dodgers and the Giants - and keep a running table for the pitchers, and catchers stats only. EDIT: Aside from just subscribing, maybe a loop can #include# the loop in its behavior to accomplish its goal/assimilate its function / mate/spawn. :-) These loops are pretty Magic!
  - jumploops 2y ago
    > where you have all [public or private] loops register - and then you can route logic based on loops that exist - and since its promptable This is actually where we started :) We had trouble keeping all the context in via RAG and the original 8k token window, but we're aiming to bring this back in the (hopefully near) future.

Technically yes, but it would require reverse-engineering some of our APIs. Practically speaking, we have quite a few use-cases where users call Loops from other Loops, so we're investigating a first-class API to generate Loops in one go. Similar to regular software engineering, what you put in is what you get out, so we've been hesitant to launch this with the current state of LLMs/the Loop Creator as it will fail more often than not.

samstave 2y ago
This would be great in the extension format: highlights-text --> Right-Click --> New ML --> (smart dropdown for watch [price|name|date|{typed-in-prompt-instructions}] --> TAB --> (smart frequency - tabbing through {watch blah (and its auto-filling every N ) --> NAME_ML=ML01. THEN: highlights-text --> Right-Click .... WHEN {ML01} == N DO {this|ML0X} --> ML00 ML00 == EMAIL|CSV|GDrive results. ML11 == Graph all the above outputs. :-) -- A MasterLoop would be good - where you have all [public or private] loops register - and then you can route logic based on loops that exist - and since its promptable - it can summarize and suggest logic when weaving loops into cohesive lattices of behavior. And if loops can subscribe to the output of other loops -- when youre looking for certain output strands -- you can say: Find all the MLB loops daily and summarize what they say about only the Dodgers and the Giants - and keep a running table for the pitchers, and catchers stats only. EDIT: Aside from just subscribing, maybe a loop can #include# the loop in its behavior to accomplish its goal/assimilate its function / mate/spawn. :-) These loops are pretty Magic!
- jumploops 2y ago
  > where you have all [public or private] loops register - and then you can route logic based on loops that exist - and since its promptable This is actually where we started :) We had trouble keeping all the context in via RAG and the original 8k token window, but we're aiming to bring this back in the (hopefully near) future.