3 ms·
Hosting something that doesn't break your local laws or your ToS is as neutral as it gets. Not hosting something because you don't agree with them - is not. In
by 0x457 2y ago
Hosting something that doesn't break your local laws or your ToS is as neutral as it gets. Not hosting something because you don't agree with them - is not.
In this case, they broke ToS and got removed from CF.
- eli 2y agoIsn’t the operative question here, what should the ToS include in the first place? Also: I don’t really agree. Enforcement of ToS is inherently political too.
- 0x457 2y agoI'm sorry, if a place has a "do not shit of a floor" in its ToS, you go there and get kicked out because you shat on the floor. What is political about it? If you really want to argue on this, then go with "ToS are complicated for mortals to understand". > Isn’t the operative question here, what should the ToS include in the first place? No? It's a private company. You can choose to agree or not to agree with ToS and therefore make a choice of using or not using service because of its ToS. Another thing that you can complain about: CF clearly wanted to boot them off the service (see CEO's interview) and found a clause in their ToS to do so.