4 ms·
>I think they're already making the best tradeoffs. This is self-evidently false, given that people are upset enough about it to make this petition... Unless y
by skeaker 2y ago
>I think they're already making the best tradeoffs.
This is self-evidently false, given that people are upset enough about it to make this petition... Unless you meant "best" in a different sense? Not sure what you mean by this. To me it's obvious that killing a game and making it unplayable forever is perhaps the worst possible tradeoff.
- hot_gril 2y ago"Best" for the most customers, even if it ticks off some relatively small group of people. They kill old games so they can make new ones and not have to outright do subscription models. Signing a petition doesn't cost anything, so it's not meaningful. Also, I was always in that group, refusing to pay upfront for an online-only game, but I acknowledge most people don't really care.