> SOMEONE to make a bit more money by putting the space to use That someone needs to be the landlord + the tenant since those two parties would both need to ag

> SOMEONE to make a bit more money by putting the space to use That someone needs to be the landlord + the tenant since those two parties would both need to agree to change the status-quo (the lease). >It could be that... I agree that your examples are both likely culprits. Anything can be changed, though, it just needs to benefit both parties (landlord and tenant) more than the status quo