But the article wasn't about cheating. It was clearly an allegory to support what he said he was going to talk about in the opening statement. You're entitled

But the article wasn't about cheating. It was clearly an allegory to support what he said he was going to talk about in the opening statement. You're entitled to your on interpretation of course, but I think its disingenuous to look at a letter with this context and say his great concern, which he took time to write a letter about during the age of telecommunication, reminding his son that cheating isn't part of marriage.