> Yes and food should be free. Why is this not happening then? Why should food be free? I didn't say that. However, aid for developing countries has been a thi

> Yes and food should be free. Why is this not happening then? Why should food be free? I didn't say that. However, aid for developing countries has been a thing for quite a while now. Why can't it be to promote clean energy? Why isn't it happening? I assume politics and "ideology". Like for real this time. > The solutions are almost always ideological I still don't know what "ideological" means honestly. It sounds like you mean "pinko communist nonsense I don't agree with" which isn't a terribly rigorous definition. > I'm thinking of ways to actually solve the problem with realistic strategies Develop clean energy technology. Penalize carbon-emitting technology to incentivize adoption of clean tech. Subsidize clean energy technology for poorer countries. Unless "realistic" means "won't cost me a single penny personally", this is pretty damn realistic. Climate change is going to be expensive one way or another so let's do it the way that will minimize human suffering.