Great read, thanks! One minor meta point if the author is (still) around: there is something strange with the styling of the hexadecimal literals in the code.

Great read, thanks! One minor meta point if the author is (still) around: there is something strange with the styling of the hexadecimal literals in the code. Instead of having the prefix "0x", they look like "0×" even though they seem to be normal x:es in the source. Edit: Firefox 128.0.3 on Linux, btw.