4 ms·
>they are because a judge just ruled they are. but they are not a monopoly according to the Wikipedia definition that I cited in another subthread, and linked
by fuzztester 2y ago
>they are because a judge just ruled they are.
but they are not a monopoly according to the Wikipedia definition that I cited in another subthread, and linked to above, though.
and courts can be packed, which, i have been reading, has happened with the us supreme court.
- notatoad 2y agoif you want to beleive a wikipedia definition based on historical caselaw, instead of an actual judge's decision, then i guess sure, do whatever you want. if you're asking how they're a monopoly, i answered you. if you want to debate whether the judge was right or wrong, maybe phrase your question less like a question.
- fuzztester 2y ago>if you're asking how they're a monopoly, i answered you. if you want to debate whether the judge was right or wrong, maybe phrase your question less like a question. okay, i will. in fact, i also answered you, so I'll just link to my other answer again: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41167248 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41167248